Bride & Groom Chair Covers
Cute but unusable
They were cute, good quality, just had to iron or steam a little. They were too small for standard foldable chairs. We tried 3 diff sizes at the reception hall and they would not fit over. :(
August 12, 2010
Absolutely loved them
These are so cute. They fit a high back, skinny type chair. Loved them
February 15, 2010
The tux iscuter than the bride dress but they are both cute. The other reviews I read said that they were too small for most chairs and I agree they need to be made larger. I will have to make something to attach them to the chairs.
July 27, 2009
I bought these for my sons after rehearsal dinner. They were great! I turned them facing the front of the chairs so everyone could see them and placed them to be center of attention. I was very pleased with the quality and look of the covers. Won't fit all chairs.
July 14, 2009
Ahhhhh, we LOVE the look of them...but they wouldn't fit over the back of any chair we tried...they just are too narrow...but they LOOK adorable....we are going to try to figure out how to make them work...even if we have to open the seams and put ties on the sides....one of the only things ever that I haven't been fully satisfied with from this company.
June 22, 2009
I purchased these for my daughter's wedding. They were so cute! Everyone loved them!
June 20, 2009
IF YOUR HAVING A SMALL FAMILY AFFAIR, I WOULD RECOMMEND THESE. THEY DON'T FIT ON LARGE BACK CHAIRS, SO USE SMALL OR RENTAL CHAIRS. OVERALL THESE ARE A CUTE & FUN IDEA TO KEEP TRACK OF YOUR SEATS.
April 14, 2009
I bought these as a cute touch to our chairs for the wedding reception. they are good quality and great price for the product! I recommend these for rehearsal dinner or reception.
April 8, 2009
I bought these for my sons rehearsal dinner, and they were a big hit...I have had several people ask me where I got them, and if they could use mine.
March 30, 2009
They LOVED them!
The covers were a surprise at the rehearsal dinner. The happy couple loved them. They look liked they cost much more than they actually did.
February 4, 2009